ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

UNOMINDA Rolling Returns

UNO Minda Ltd.

Every 15-year stretch UNOMINDA has been through — 55 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 38.4% a year, the worst 31.5%, the best 45.2%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
55
Median
38.4%
Worst
31.5%
Best
45.2%

Every Holding Period

UNOMINDA rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

70.8% of windows made money

Across 223 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 26.4% a year. The worst lost 61.4% a year and the best made 328.4%.

-61.4%median 26.4%328.4%
Worst window
-61.4%
25th percentile
-4.9%
75th percentile
99.3%
Best window
328.4%

Worst start: December 2007-61.4% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: December 2016328.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: UNOMINDA came out ahead in 67.7% of the 223 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

87.9% of windows made money

Across 199 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 36.5% a year. The worst lost 26.2% a year and the best made 145.9%.

-26.2%median 36.5%145.9%
Worst window
-26.2%
25th percentile
15.1%
75th percentile
57.6%
Best window
145.9%

Worst start: September 2010-26.2% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: May 2014145.9% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: UNOMINDA came out ahead in 83.9% of the 199 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

96.6% of windows made money

Across 175 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 39.3% a year. The worst lost 15.7% a year and the best made 121.0%.

-15.7%median 39.3%121.0%
Worst window
-15.7%
25th percentile
21.6%
75th percentile
57.5%
Best window
121.0%

Worst start: July 2008-15.7% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: August 2013121.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: UNOMINDA came out ahead in 90.9% of the 175 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 151 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 43.9% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 4.2% a year.

4.2%median 43.9%75.3%
Worst window
4.2%
25th percentile
32.9%
75th percentile
61.0%
Best window
75.3%

Worst start: April 20074.2% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: February 201475.3% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: UNOMINDA came out ahead in 96.0% of the 151 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 115 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 47.0% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 30.8% a year.

30.8%median 47.0%65.1%
Worst window
30.8%
25th percentile
40.8%
75th percentile
55.5%
Best window
65.1%

Worst start: March 201030.8% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: August 201365.1% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: UNOMINDA came out ahead in 100.0% of the 115 windows both series cover.

15-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 55 separate 15-year holding periods, the median returned 38.4% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 31.5% a year.

31.5%median 38.4%45.2%
Worst window
31.5%
25th percentile
36.5%
75th percentile
40.9%
Best window
45.2%

Worst start: May 200831.5% a year for the 15 years that followed.

Best start: February 200945.2% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: UNOMINDA came out ahead in 100.0% of the 55 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often UNOMINDA beat the Nifty 500

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 15-year windows, UNOMINDA finished ahead of the Nifty 500 in 100.0% of the 55 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 67.7% of 223 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 83.9% of 199 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 90.9% of 175 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 96.0% of 151 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 115 periods.

15-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 55 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of UNOMINDA's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

UNOMINDAis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2007-02-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

UNOMINDA rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are UNOMINDA rolling returns?
+

Over 15 years, UNO Minda Ltd. has been through 55 separate 15 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 38.4% a year, the worst 31.5% and the best 45.2%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has UNOMINDA ever lost money over 10 years?
+

No — not in any of the 115 10 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 30.8% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 10 years, and it is measured only over the years UNO Minda Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years UNOMINDA has ever had?
+

-15.7% a year, for the five years beginning July 2008. For contrast the best 5 years returned 121.0% a year, starting August 2013, and the median across all 175 periods was 39.3%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding UNOMINDA for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -61.4% to 328.4% a year — a spread of 389.8%. 15 years outcomes ranged from 31.5% to 45.2%, a spread of 13.7%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has UNOMINDA beaten Nifty 500 over 15 years?
+

In 100.0% of the 55 15 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of UNO Minda Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is UNOMINDA a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of UNO Minda Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on UNO Minda Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.