ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

SWANCORP Rolling Returns

Swan Corp Ltd.

Every 10-year stretch SWANCORP has been through — 52 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 20.6% a year, the worst 10.3%, the best 29.4%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
52
Median
20.6%
Worst
10.3%
Best
29.4%

Every Holding Period

SWANCORP rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

63.8% of windows made money

Across 160 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 8.0% a year. The worst lost 53.3% a year and the best made 245.5%.

-53.3%median 8.0%245.5%
Worst window
-53.3%
25th percentile
-13.9%
75th percentile
39.5%
Best window
245.5%

Worst start: January 2018-53.3% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: July 2023245.5% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: SWANCORP came out ahead in 47.5% of the 160 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

80.2% of windows made money

Across 136 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 21.6% a year. The worst lost 14.8% a year and the best made 73.3%.

-14.8%median 21.6%73.3%
Worst window
-14.8%
25th percentile
1.6%
75th percentile
35.8%
Best window
73.3%

Worst start: January 2018-14.8% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: November 202173.3% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: SWANCORP came out ahead in 63.2% of the 136 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

97.3% of windows made money

Across 112 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 16.8% a year. The worst lost 4.5% a year and the best made 48.8%.

-4.5%median 16.8%48.8%
Worst window
-4.5%
25th percentile
11.7%
75th percentile
26.5%
Best window
48.8%

Worst start: November 2016-4.5% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: July 201948.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: SWANCORP came out ahead in 79.5% of the 112 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 88 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 16.6% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 6.0% a year.

6.0%median 16.6%28.4%
Worst window
6.0%
25th percentile
12.6%
75th percentile
20.8%
Best window
28.4%

Worst start: June 20126.0% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: July 201728.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: SWANCORP came out ahead in 83.0% of the 88 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 52 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 20.6% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 10.3% a year.

10.3%median 20.6%29.4%
Worst window
10.3%
25th percentile
16.6%
75th percentile
23.4%
Best window
29.4%

Worst start: June 201210.3% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: December 201429.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: SWANCORP came out ahead in 94.2% of the 52 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often SWANCORP beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 10-year windows, SWANCORP finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 94.2% of the 52 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 47.5% of 160 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 63.2% of 136 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 79.5% of 112 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 83.0% of 88 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 94.2% of 52 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of SWANCORP's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

SWANCORPis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2012-05-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

SWANCORP rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are SWANCORP rolling returns?
+

Over 10 years, Swan Corp Ltd. has been through 52 separate 10 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 20.6% a year, the worst 10.3% and the best 29.4%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has SWANCORP ever lost money over 10 years?
+

No — not in any of the 52 10 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 10.3% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 10 years, and it is measured only over the years Swan Corp Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years SWANCORP has ever had?
+

-4.5% a year, for the five years beginning November 2016. For contrast the best 5 years returned 48.8% a year, starting July 2019, and the median across all 112 periods was 16.8%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding SWANCORP for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -53.3% to 245.5% a year — a spread of 298.8%. 10 years outcomes ranged from 10.3% to 29.4%, a spread of 19.1%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has SWANCORP beaten Nifty 50 over 10 years?
+

In 94.2% of the 52 10 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Swan Corp Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is SWANCORP a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Swan Corp Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Swan Corp Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.