Rolling Returns
REC Ltd.
Every 15-year stretch RECLTD has been through — 42 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 18.7% a year, the worst 14.1%, the best 28.8%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.
Every Holding Period
A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.
Across 210 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 11.8% a year. The worst lost 49.4% a year and the best made 363.0%.
Worst start: October 2010 — -49.4% a year for the 1 years that followed.
Best start: November 2008 — 363.0% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: RECLTD came out ahead in 49.5% of the 210 windows both series cover.
Across 186 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 15.8% a year. The worst lost 16.8% a year and the best made 95.3%.
Worst start: August 2010 — -16.8% a year for the 3 years that followed.
Best start: July 2021 — 95.3% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: RECLTD came out ahead in 57.0% of the 186 windows both series cover.
Across 162 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 13.2% a year. The worst lost 4.8% a year and the best made 56.9%.
Worst start: March 2015 — -4.8% a year for the 5 years that followed.
Best start: March 2020 — 56.9% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: RECLTD came out ahead in 56.8% of the 162 windows both series cover.
Across 138 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 12.0% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 3.3% a year.
Worst start: November 2010 — 3.3% a year for the 7 years that followed.
Best start: June 2018 — 36.8% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: RECLTD came out ahead in 50.0% of the 138 windows both series cover.
Across 102 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 14.1% a year. The worst lost 0.2% a year and the best made 32.3%.
Worst start: October 2010 — -0.2% a year for the 10 years that followed.
Best start: January 2014 — 32.3% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: RECLTD came out ahead in 57.8% of the 102 windows both series cover.
Across 42 separate 15-year holding periods, the median returned 18.7% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 14.1% a year.
Worst start: October 2010 — 14.1% a year for the 15 years that followed.
Best start: November 2008 — 28.8% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: RECLTD came out ahead in 100.0% of the 42 windows both series cover.
Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.
Against The Index
Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 15-year windows, RECLTD finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 100.0% of the 42 periods both series cover.
1-year windows
Ahead in 49.5% of 210 periods.
3-year windows
Ahead in 57.0% of 186 periods.
5-year windows
Ahead in 56.8% of 162 periods.
7-year windows
Ahead in 50.0% of 138 periods.
10-year windows
Ahead in 57.8% of 102 periods.
15-year windows
Ahead in 100.0% of 42 periods.
Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.
How This Is Calculated
Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of RECLTD's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.
Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.
RECLTDis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.
Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2008-03-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.
HELP CENTER
Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.
Over 15 years, REC Ltd. has been through 42 separate 15 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 18.7% a year, the worst 14.1% and the best 28.8%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.
Yes. 1.0% of the 102 10 years periods on record ended below where they started, and the worst of them lost 0.2% a year — the stretch beginning October 2010. The median period returned 14.1% a year.
-4.8% a year, for the five years beginning March 2015. For contrast the best 5 years returned 56.9% a year, starting March 2020, and the median across all 162 periods was 13.2%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.
On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -49.4% to 363.0% a year — a spread of 412.4%. 15 years outcomes ranged from 14.1% to 28.8%, a spread of 14.7%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.
In 100.0% of the 42 15 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.
Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of REC Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.
That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of REC Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.
Explore Further
RECLTD drawdowns and all-time high
The worst fall on record, how long recovery took, and how far the price sits below its peak.
RECLTD SIP returns
What a monthly investment would have produced, backtested rather than assumed.
RECLTD overview
Price history, wealth journey and how it compares with the index.
Rolling returns for every stock
Run the same question against any company we track.
ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.