Rolling Returns
PI Industries Ltd.
Every 10-year stretch PIIND has been through — 63 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 31.1% a year, the worst 12.0%, the best 45.9%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.
Every Holding Period
A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.
Across 171 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 22.2% a year. The worst lost 37.5% a year and the best made 253.7%.
Worst start: June 2025 — -37.5% a year for the 1 years that followed.
Best start: August 2013 — 253.7% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: PIIND came out ahead in 60.8% of the 171 windows both series cover.
Across 147 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 26.8% a year. The worst lost 13.0% a year and the best made 93.8%.
Worst start: June 2023 — -13.0% a year for the 3 years that followed.
Best start: May 2012 — 93.8% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: PIIND came out ahead in 76.9% of the 147 windows both series cover.
Across 123 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 29.9% a year. The worst lost 6.2% a year and the best made 60.5%.
Worst start: August 2021 — -6.2% a year for the 5 years that followed.
Best start: June 2011 — 60.5% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: PIIND came out ahead in 87.8% of the 123 windows both series cover.
Across 99 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 27.7% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 11.7% a year.
Worst start: August 2019 — 11.7% a year for the 7 years that followed.
Best start: October 2012 — 47.0% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: PIIND came out ahead in 99.0% of the 99 windows both series cover.
Across 63 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 31.1% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 12.0% a year.
Worst start: August 2016 — 12.0% a year for the 10 years that followed.
Best start: June 2011 — 45.9% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: PIIND came out ahead in 100.0% of the 63 windows both series cover.
Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.
Against The Index
Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 10-year windows, PIIND finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 100.0% of the 63 periods both series cover.
1-year windows
Ahead in 60.8% of 171 periods.
3-year windows
Ahead in 76.9% of 147 periods.
5-year windows
Ahead in 87.8% of 123 periods.
7-year windows
Ahead in 99.0% of 99 periods.
10-year windows
Ahead in 100.0% of 63 periods.
Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.
How This Is Calculated
Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of PIIND's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.
Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.
PIINDis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.
Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2011-06-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.
HELP CENTER
Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.
Over 10 years, PI Industries Ltd. has been through 63 separate 10 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 31.1% a year, the worst 12.0% and the best 45.9%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.
No — not in any of the 63 10 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 12.0% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 10 years, and it is measured only over the years PI Industries Ltd. has been listed.
-6.2% a year, for the five years beginning August 2021. For contrast the best 5 years returned 60.5% a year, starting June 2011, and the median across all 123 periods was 29.9%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.
On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -37.5% to 253.7% a year — a spread of 291.2%. 10 years outcomes ranged from 12.0% to 45.9%, a spread of 33.9%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.
In 100.0% of the 63 10 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.
Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of PI Industries Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.
That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of PI Industries Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.
Explore Further
PIIND drawdowns and all-time high
The worst fall on record, how long recovery took, and how far the price sits below its peak.
PIIND SIP returns
What a monthly investment would have produced, backtested rather than assumed.
PIIND overview
Price history, wealth journey and how it compares with the index.
Rolling returns for every stock
Run the same question against any company we track.
ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.