ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

PFC Rolling Returns

Power Finance Corporation Ltd.

Every 15-year stretch PFC has been through — 55 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 15.1% a year, the worst 4.3%, the best 20.8%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
55
Median
15.1%
Worst
4.3%
Best
20.8%

Every Holding Period

PFC rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

59.2% of windows made money

Across 223 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 9.8% a year. The worst lost 57.6% a year and the best made 316.3%.

-57.6%median 9.8%316.3%
Worst window
-57.6%
25th percentile
-14.7%
75th percentile
53.9%
Best window
316.3%

Worst start: August 2010-57.6% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: January 2023316.3% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: PFC came out ahead in 50.7% of the 223 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

72.4% of windows made money

Across 199 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 14.0% a year. The worst lost 30.1% a year and the best made 88.8%.

-30.1%median 14.0%88.8%
Worst window
-30.1%
25th percentile
-1.0%
75th percentile
29.5%
Best window
88.8%

Worst start: August 2010-30.1% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: July 202188.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: PFC came out ahead in 48.7% of the 199 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

84.6% of windows made money

Across 175 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 8.6% a year. The worst lost 6.6% a year and the best made 57.5%.

-6.6%median 8.6%57.5%
Worst window
-6.6%
25th percentile
2.7%
75th percentile
17.7%
Best window
57.5%

Worst start: May 2015-6.6% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: August 201957.5% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: PFC came out ahead in 38.9% of the 175 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

98.0% of windows made money

Across 151 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 8.8% a year. The worst lost 0.9% a year and the best made 40.0%.

-0.9%median 8.8%40.0%
Worst window
-0.9%
25th percentile
5.1%
75th percentile
20.0%
Best window
40.0%

Worst start: August 2010-0.9% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: June 201840.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: PFC came out ahead in 43.0% of the 151 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

93.9% of windows made money

Across 115 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 9.3% a year. The worst lost 2.9% a year and the best made 31.3%.

-2.9%median 9.3%31.3%
Worst window
-2.9%
25th percentile
5.6%
75th percentile
22.0%
Best window
31.3%

Worst start: October 2010-2.9% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: January 201431.3% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: PFC came out ahead in 39.1% of the 115 windows both series cover.

15-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 55 separate 15-year holding periods, the median returned 15.1% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 4.3% a year.

4.3%median 15.1%20.8%
Worst window
4.3%
25th percentile
10.2%
75th percentile
18.1%
Best window
20.8%

Worst start: October 20074.3% a year for the 15 years that followed.

Best start: January 200920.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 500: PFC came out ahead in 76.4% of the 55 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often PFC beat the Nifty 500

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 15-year windows, PFC finished ahead of the Nifty 500 in 76.4% of the 55 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 50.7% of 223 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 48.7% of 199 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 38.9% of 175 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 43.0% of 151 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 39.1% of 115 periods.

15-year windows

Ahead in 76.4% of 55 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of PFC's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

PFCis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2007-02-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

PFC rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are PFC rolling returns?
+

Over 15 years, Power Finance Corporation Ltd. has been through 55 separate 15 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 15.1% a year, the worst 4.3% and the best 20.8%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has PFC ever lost money over 10 years?
+

Yes. 6.1% of the 115 10 years periods on record ended below where they started, and the worst of them lost 2.9% a year — the stretch beginning October 2010. The median period returned 9.3% a year.

What is the worst 5 years PFC has ever had?
+

-6.6% a year, for the five years beginning May 2015. For contrast the best 5 years returned 57.5% a year, starting August 2019, and the median across all 175 periods was 8.6%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding PFC for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -57.6% to 316.3% a year — a spread of 373.9%. 15 years outcomes ranged from 4.3% to 20.8%, a spread of 16.5%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has PFC beaten Nifty 500 over 15 years?
+

In 76.4% of the 55 15 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Power Finance Corporation Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is PFC a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Power Finance Corporation Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Power Finance Corporation Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.