ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

NAM-INDIA Rolling Returns

Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd.

Every 7-year stretch NAM-INDIA has been through — 22 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 26.0% a year, the worst 12.6%, the best 34.2%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
22
Median
26.0%
Worst
12.6%
Best
34.2%

Every Holding Period

NAM-INDIA rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

71.3% of windows made money

Across 94 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 25.6% a year. The worst lost 50.8% a year and the best made 171.0%.

-50.8%median 25.6%171.0%
Worst window
-50.8%
25th percentile
-7.7%
75th percentile
56.9%
Best window
171.0%

Worst start: January 2018-50.8% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: January 2019171.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: NAM-INDIA came out ahead in 57.5% of the 94 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

91.4% of windows made money

Across 70 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 21.6% a year. The worst lost 15.0% a year and the best made 69.1%.

-15.0%median 21.6%69.1%
Worst window
-15.0%
25th percentile
9.7%
75th percentile
38.6%
Best window
69.1%

Worst start: February 2020-15.0% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: May 202369.1% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: NAM-INDIA came out ahead in 68.6% of the 70 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

91.3% of windows made money

Across 46 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 23.9% a year. The worst lost 1.6% a year and the best made 34.9%.

-1.6%median 23.9%34.9%
Worst window
-1.6%
25th percentile
14.4%
75th percentile
27.6%
Best window
34.9%

Worst start: February 2018-1.6% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: January 201934.9% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: NAM-INDIA came out ahead in 71.7% of the 46 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 22 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 26.0% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 12.6% a year.

12.6%median 26.0%34.2%
Worst window
12.6%
25th percentile
19.1%
75th percentile
29.9%
Best window
34.2%

Worst start: February 201812.6% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: January 201934.2% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: NAM-INDIA came out ahead in 100.0% of the 22 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often NAM-INDIA beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 7-year windows, NAM-INDIA finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 100.0% of the 22 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 57.5% of 94 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 68.6% of 70 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 71.7% of 46 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 22 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of NAM-INDIA's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

NAM-INDIAis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2017-11-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

NAM-INDIA rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are NAM-INDIA rolling returns?
+

Over 7 years, Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd. has been through 22 separate 7 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 26.0% a year, the worst 12.6% and the best 34.2%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has NAM-INDIA ever lost money over 7 years?
+

No — not in any of the 22 7 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 12.6% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 7 years, and it is measured only over the years Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years NAM-INDIA has ever had?
+

-1.6% a year, for the five years beginning February 2018. For contrast the best 5 years returned 34.9% a year, starting January 2019, and the median across all 46 periods was 23.9%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding NAM-INDIA for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -50.8% to 171.0% a year — a spread of 221.8%. 7 years outcomes ranged from 12.6% to 34.2%, a spread of 21.6%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has NAM-INDIA beaten Nifty 50 over 7 years?
+

In 100.0% of the 22 7 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is NAM-INDIA a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.