ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

MOTILALOFS Rolling Returns

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd.

Every 15-year stretch MOTILALOFS has been through — 48 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 12.1% a year, the worst 4.6%, the best 22.8%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
48
Median
12.1%
Worst
4.6%
Best
22.8%

Every Holding Period

MOTILALOFS rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

53.7% of windows made money

Across 216 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 5.2% a year. The worst lost 83.2% a year and the best made 288.6%.

-83.2%median 5.2%288.6%
Worst window
-83.2%
25th percentile
-21.0%
75th percentile
47.5%
Best window
288.6%

Worst start: November 2007-83.2% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: January 2014288.6% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: MOTILALOFS came out ahead in 49.1% of the 216 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

63.5% of windows made money

Across 192 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 7.4% a year. The worst lost 28.6% a year and the best made 102.8%.

-28.6%median 7.4%102.8%
Worst window
-28.6%
25th percentile
-9.7%
75th percentile
34.2%
Best window
102.8%

Worst start: October 2010-28.6% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: October 2013102.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: MOTILALOFS came out ahead in 38.0% of the 192 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

78.0% of windows made money

Across 168 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 11.1% a year. The worst lost 20.0% a year and the best made 67.7%.

-20.0%median 11.1%67.7%
Worst window
-20.0%
25th percentile
2.3%
75th percentile
23.3%
Best window
67.7%

Worst start: December 2007-20.0% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: February 201367.7% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: MOTILALOFS came out ahead in 47.6% of the 168 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

86.8% of windows made money

Across 144 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 17.8% a year. The worst lost 9.1% a year and the best made 38.8%.

-9.1%median 17.8%38.8%
Worst window
-9.1%
25th percentile
7.6%
75th percentile
30.3%
Best window
38.8%

Worst start: January 2018-9.1% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: August 201138.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: MOTILALOFS came out ahead in 64.6% of the 144 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 108 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 17.5% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 6.5% a year.

6.5%median 17.5%32.2%
Worst window
6.5%
25th percentile
13.2%
75th percentile
23.3%
Best window
32.2%

Worst start: July 20166.5% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: November 201332.2% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: MOTILALOFS came out ahead in 80.6% of the 108 windows both series cover.

15-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 48 separate 15-year holding periods, the median returned 12.1% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 4.6% a year.

4.6%median 12.1%22.8%
Worst window
4.6%
25th percentile
10.3%
75th percentile
13.9%
Best window
22.8%

Worst start: December 20074.6% a year for the 15 years that followed.

Best start: November 200822.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: MOTILALOFS came out ahead in 70.8% of the 48 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often MOTILALOFS beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 15-year windows, MOTILALOFS finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 70.8% of the 48 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 49.1% of 216 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 38.0% of 192 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 47.6% of 168 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 64.6% of 144 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 80.6% of 108 periods.

15-year windows

Ahead in 70.8% of 48 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of MOTILALOFS's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

MOTILALOFSis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2007-09-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

MOTILALOFS rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are MOTILALOFS rolling returns?
+

Over 15 years, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. has been through 48 separate 15 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 12.1% a year, the worst 4.6% and the best 22.8%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has MOTILALOFS ever lost money over 10 years?
+

No — not in any of the 108 10 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 6.5% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 10 years, and it is measured only over the years Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years MOTILALOFS has ever had?
+

-20.0% a year, for the five years beginning December 2007. For contrast the best 5 years returned 67.7% a year, starting February 2013, and the median across all 168 periods was 11.1%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding MOTILALOFS for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -83.2% to 288.6% a year — a spread of 371.8%. 15 years outcomes ranged from 4.6% to 22.8%, a spread of 18.2%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has MOTILALOFS beaten Nifty 50 over 15 years?
+

In 70.8% of the 48 15 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is MOTILALOFS a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.