ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

LAURUSLABS Rolling Returns

Laurus Labs Ltd.

Every 7-year stretch LAURUSLABS has been through — 33 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 30.1% a year, the worst 19.9%, the best 62.8%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
33
Median
30.1%
Worst
19.9%
Best
62.8%

Every Holding Period

LAURUSLABS rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

61.9% of windows made money

Across 105 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 26.9% a year. The worst lost 50.2% a year and the best made 568.0%.

-50.2%median 26.9%568.0%
Worst window
-50.2%
25th percentile
-18.2%
75th percentile
82.0%
Best window
568.0%

Worst start: March 2022-50.2% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: June 2020568.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LAURUSLABS came out ahead in 54.3% of the 105 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

82.7% of windows made money

Across 81 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 43.9% a year. The worst lost 14.6% a year and the best made 107.6%.

-14.6%median 43.9%107.6%
Worst window
-14.6%
25th percentile
4.0%
75th percentile
73.2%
Best window
107.6%

Worst start: June 2021-14.6% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: August 2019107.6% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LAURUSLABS came out ahead in 64.2% of the 81 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 57 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 37.8% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 17.5% a year.

17.5%median 37.8%57.3%
Worst window
17.5%
25th percentile
26.8%
75th percentile
43.1%
Best window
57.3%

Worst start: June 202117.5% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: March 202057.3% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LAURUSLABS came out ahead in 100.0% of the 57 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 33 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 30.1% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 19.9% a year.

19.9%median 30.1%62.8%
Worst window
19.9%
25th percentile
24.4%
75th percentile
45.6%
Best window
62.8%

Worst start: June 201719.9% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: August 201962.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LAURUSLABS came out ahead in 100.0% of the 33 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often LAURUSLABS beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 7-year windows, LAURUSLABS finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 100.0% of the 33 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 54.3% of 105 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 64.2% of 81 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 57 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 33 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of LAURUSLABS's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

LAURUSLABSis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2016-12-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

LAURUSLABS rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are LAURUSLABS rolling returns?
+

Over 7 years, Laurus Labs Ltd. has been through 33 separate 7 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 30.1% a year, the worst 19.9% and the best 62.8%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has LAURUSLABS ever lost money over 7 years?
+

No — not in any of the 33 7 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 19.9% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 7 years, and it is measured only over the years Laurus Labs Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years LAURUSLABS has ever had?
+

17.5% a year, for the five years beginning June 2021. For contrast the best 5 years returned 57.3% a year, starting March 2020, and the median across all 57 periods was 37.8%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding LAURUSLABS for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -50.2% to 568.0% a year — a spread of 618.2%. 7 years outcomes ranged from 19.9% to 62.8%, a spread of 42.9%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has LAURUSLABS beaten Nifty 50 over 7 years?
+

In 100.0% of the 33 7 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Laurus Labs Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is LAURUSLABS a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Laurus Labs Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Laurus Labs Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.