ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

LALPATHLAB Rolling Returns

Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd.

Every 7-year stretch LALPATHLAB has been through — 45 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 16.8% a year, the worst 10.9%, the best 23.6%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
45
Median
16.8%
Worst
10.9%
Best
23.6%

Every Holding Period

LALPATHLAB rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

67.5% of windows made money

Across 117 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 14.6% a year. The worst lost 40.5% a year and the best made 130.4%.

-40.5%median 14.6%130.4%
Worst window
-40.5%
25th percentile
-3.2%
75th percentile
33.5%
Best window
130.4%

Worst start: December 2021-40.5% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: August 2020130.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LALPATHLAB came out ahead in 54.7% of the 117 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

86.0% of windows made money

Across 93 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 11.8% a year. The worst lost 7.1% a year and the best made 64.9%.

-7.1%median 11.8%64.9%
Worst window
-7.1%
25th percentile
5.7%
75th percentile
28.2%
Best window
64.9%

Worst start: December 2021-7.1% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: November 201864.9% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LALPATHLAB came out ahead in 45.2% of the 93 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

97.1% of windows made money

Across 69 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 19.5% a year. The worst lost 0.7% a year and the best made 31.8%.

-0.7%median 19.5%31.8%
Worst window
-0.7%
25th percentile
13.1%
75th percentile
23.9%
Best window
31.8%

Worst start: April 2021-0.7% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: June 201631.8% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LALPATHLAB came out ahead in 69.6% of the 69 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 45 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 16.8% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 10.9% a year.

10.9%median 16.8%23.6%
Worst window
10.9%
25th percentile
14.0%
75th percentile
19.3%
Best window
23.6%

Worst start: March 201610.9% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: August 201723.6% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: LALPATHLAB came out ahead in 82.2% of the 45 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often LALPATHLAB beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 7-year windows, LALPATHLAB finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 82.2% of the 45 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 54.7% of 117 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 45.2% of 93 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 69.6% of 69 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 82.2% of 45 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of LALPATHLAB's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

LALPATHLABis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2015-12-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

LALPATHLAB rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are LALPATHLAB rolling returns?
+

Over 7 years, Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd. has been through 45 separate 7 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 16.8% a year, the worst 10.9% and the best 23.6%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has LALPATHLAB ever lost money over 7 years?
+

No — not in any of the 45 7 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 10.9% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 7 years, and it is measured only over the years Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years LALPATHLAB has ever had?
+

-0.7% a year, for the five years beginning April 2021. For contrast the best 5 years returned 31.8% a year, starting June 2016, and the median across all 69 periods was 19.5%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding LALPATHLAB for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -40.5% to 130.4% a year — a spread of 170.9%. 7 years outcomes ranged from 10.9% to 23.6%, a spread of 12.8%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has LALPATHLAB beaten Nifty 50 over 7 years?
+

In 82.2% of the 45 7 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is LALPATHLAB a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.