ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

INOXWIND Rolling Returns

Inox Wind Ltd.

Every 10-year stretch INOXWIND has been through — 17 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 4.3% a year, the worst 1.5%, the best 6.0%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
17
Median
4.3%
Worst
1.5%
Best
6.0%

Every Holding Period

INOXWIND rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

40.8% of windows made money

Across 125 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned -21.9% a year. The worst lost 72.3% a year and the best made 493.0%.

-72.3%median -21.9%493.0%
Worst window
-72.3%
25th percentile
-41.0%
75th percentile
58.7%
Best window
493.0%

Worst start: March 2019-72.3% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: February 2023493.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: INOXWIND came out ahead in 40.0% of the 125 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

61.4% of windows made money

Across 101 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 17.2% a year. The worst lost 52.4% a year and the best made 113.2%.

-52.4%median 17.2%113.2%
Worst window
-52.4%
25th percentile
-34.6%
75th percentile
70.4%
Best window
113.2%

Worst start: March 2017-52.4% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: September 2021113.2% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: INOXWIND came out ahead in 53.5% of the 101 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

54.5% of windows made money

Across 77 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 12.9% a year. The worst lost 43.0% a year and the best made 104.1%.

-43.0%median 12.9%104.1%
Worst window
-43.0%
25th percentile
-10.7%
75th percentile
52.9%
Best window
104.1%

Worst start: May 2015-43.0% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: March 2020104.1% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: INOXWIND came out ahead in 50.6% of the 77 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

67.9% of windows made money

Across 53 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 23.5% a year. The worst lost 21.3% a year and the best made 36.5%.

-21.3%median 23.5%36.5%
Worst window
-21.3%
25th percentile
-6.2%
75th percentile
29.4%
Best window
36.5%

Worst start: June 2015-21.3% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: September 201736.5% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: INOXWIND came out ahead in 62.3% of the 53 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 17 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 4.3% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 1.5% a year.

1.5%median 4.3%6.0%
Worst window
1.5%
25th percentile
3.7%
75th percentile
4.7%
Best window
6.0%

Worst start: March 20161.5% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: May 20156.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: INOXWIND came out ahead in 0.0% of the 17 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often INOXWIND beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 10-year windows, INOXWIND finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 0.0% of the 17 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 40.0% of 125 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 53.5% of 101 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 50.6% of 77 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 62.3% of 53 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 0.0% of 17 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of INOXWIND's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

INOXWINDis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2015-04-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

INOXWIND rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are INOXWIND rolling returns?
+

Over 10 years, Inox Wind Ltd. has been through 17 separate 10 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 4.3% a year, the worst 1.5% and the best 6.0%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has INOXWIND ever lost money over 10 years?
+

No — not in any of the 17 10 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 1.5% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 10 years, and it is measured only over the years Inox Wind Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years INOXWIND has ever had?
+

-43.0% a year, for the five years beginning May 2015. For contrast the best 5 years returned 104.1% a year, starting March 2020, and the median across all 77 periods was 12.9%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding INOXWIND for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -72.3% to 493.0% a year — a spread of 565.3%. 10 years outcomes ranged from 1.5% to 6.0%, a spread of 4.5%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has INOXWIND beaten Nifty 50 over 10 years?
+

In 0.0% of the 17 10 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Inox Wind Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is INOXWIND a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Inox Wind Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Inox Wind Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.