Rolling Returns
Gravita India Ltd.
Every 10-year stretch GRAVITA has been through — 70 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 38.5% a year, the worst -0.3%, the best 58.1%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.
Every Holding Period
A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.
Across 178 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 55.2% a year. The worst lost 87.5% a year and the best made 423.4%.
Worst start: June 2012 — -87.5% a year for the 1 years that followed.
Best start: October 2020 — 423.4% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: GRAVITA came out ahead in 61.2% of the 178 windows both series cover.
Across 154 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 33.1% a year. The worst lost 45.3% a year and the best made 189.0%.
Worst start: January 2013 — -45.3% a year for the 3 years that followed.
Best start: October 2020 — 189.0% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: GRAVITA came out ahead in 59.1% of the 154 windows both series cover.
Across 130 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 27.4% a year. The worst lost 22.6% a year and the best made 127.5%.
Worst start: June 2011 — -22.6% a year for the 5 years that followed.
Best start: September 2019 — 127.5% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: GRAVITA came out ahead in 68.5% of the 130 windows both series cover.
Across 106 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 37.0% a year. The worst lost 18.6% a year and the best made 73.1%.
Worst start: July 2012 — -18.6% a year for the 7 years that followed.
Best start: August 2019 — 73.1% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: GRAVITA came out ahead in 76.4% of the 106 windows both series cover.
Across 70 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 38.5% a year. The worst lost 0.3% a year and the best made 58.1%.
Worst start: November 2010 — -0.3% a year for the 10 years that followed.
Best start: June 2016 — 58.1% a year.
Against the Nifty 50: GRAVITA came out ahead in 64.3% of the 70 windows both series cover.
Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.
Against The Index
Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 10-year windows, GRAVITA finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 64.3% of the 70 periods both series cover.
1-year windows
Ahead in 61.2% of 178 periods.
3-year windows
Ahead in 59.1% of 154 periods.
5-year windows
Ahead in 68.5% of 130 periods.
7-year windows
Ahead in 76.4% of 106 periods.
10-year windows
Ahead in 64.3% of 70 periods.
Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.
How This Is Calculated
Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of GRAVITA's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.
Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.
GRAVITAis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.
Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2010-11-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.
HELP CENTER
Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.
Over 10 years, Gravita India Ltd. has been through 70 separate 10 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 38.5% a year, the worst -0.3% and the best 58.1%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.
Yes. 1.4% of the 70 10 years periods on record ended below where they started, and the worst of them lost 0.3% a year — the stretch beginning November 2010. The median period returned 38.5% a year.
-22.6% a year, for the five years beginning June 2011. For contrast the best 5 years returned 127.5% a year, starting September 2019, and the median across all 130 periods was 27.4%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.
On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -87.5% to 423.4% a year — a spread of 510.9%. 10 years outcomes ranged from -0.3% to 58.1%, a spread of 58.4%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.
In 64.3% of the 70 10 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.
Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Gravita India Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.
That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Gravita India Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.
Explore Further
GRAVITA drawdowns and all-time high
The worst fall on record, how long recovery took, and how far the price sits below its peak.
GRAVITA SIP returns
What a monthly investment would have produced, backtested rather than assumed.
GRAVITA overview
Price history, wealth journey and how it compares with the index.
Rolling returns for every stock
Run the same question against any company we track.
ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.