ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

CREDITACC Rolling Returns

CreditAccess Grameen Ltd.

Every 7-year stretch CREDITACC has been through — 13 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 17.3% a year, the worst 12.8%, the best 24.6%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
13
Median
17.3%
Worst
12.8%
Best
24.6%

Every Holding Period

CREDITACC rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

65.9% of windows made money

Across 85 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 21.6% a year. The worst lost 46.4% a year and the best made 124.0%.

-46.4%median 21.6%124.0%
Worst window
-46.4%
25th percentile
-6.0%
75th percentile
52.4%
Best window
124.0%

Worst start: November 2023-46.4% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: September 2018124.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CREDITACC came out ahead in 60.0% of the 85 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

98.4% of windows made money

Across 61 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 19.3% a year. The worst lost 0.3% a year and the best made 46.9%.

-0.3%median 19.3%46.9%
Worst window
-0.3%
25th percentile
9.0%
75th percentile
26.3%
Best window
46.9%

Worst start: August 2023-0.3% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: May 202046.9% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CREDITACC came out ahead in 65.6% of the 61 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 37 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 17.2% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 1.9% a year.

1.9%median 17.2%38.4%
Worst window
1.9%
25th percentile
12.9%
75th percentile
23.6%
Best window
38.4%

Worst start: February 20201.9% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: October 201838.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CREDITACC came out ahead in 64.9% of the 37 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 13 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 17.3% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 12.8% a year.

12.8%median 17.3%24.6%
Worst window
12.8%
25th percentile
14.1%
75th percentile
19.4%
Best window
24.6%

Worst start: March 201912.8% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: September 201824.6% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CREDITACC came out ahead in 100.0% of the 13 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often CREDITACC beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 7-year windows, CREDITACC finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 100.0% of the 13 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 60.0% of 85 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 65.6% of 61 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 64.9% of 37 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 13 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of CREDITACC's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

CREDITACCis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2018-08-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

CREDITACC rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are CREDITACC rolling returns?
+

Over 7 years, CreditAccess Grameen Ltd. has been through 13 separate 7 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 17.3% a year, the worst 12.8% and the best 24.6%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has CREDITACC ever lost money over 7 years?
+

No — not in any of the 13 7 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 12.8% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 7 years, and it is measured only over the years CreditAccess Grameen Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years CREDITACC has ever had?
+

1.9% a year, for the five years beginning February 2020. For contrast the best 5 years returned 38.4% a year, starting October 2018, and the median across all 37 periods was 17.2%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding CREDITACC for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -46.4% to 124.0% a year — a spread of 170.4%. 7 years outcomes ranged from 12.8% to 24.6%, a spread of 11.7%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has CREDITACC beaten Nifty 50 over 7 years?
+

In 100.0% of the 13 7 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of CreditAccess Grameen Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is CREDITACC a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of CreditAccess Grameen Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on CreditAccess Grameen Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.