ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

CGCL Rolling Returns

Capri Global Capital Ltd.

Every 10-year stretch CGCL has been through — 71 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 31.1% a year, the worst 6.5%, the best 45.9%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
71
Median
31.1%
Worst
6.5%
Best
45.9%

Every Holding Period

CGCL rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

67.0% of windows made money

Across 179 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 28.6% a year. The worst lost 83.9% a year and the best made 218.3%.

-83.9%median 28.6%218.3%
Worst window
-83.9%
25th percentile
-9.2%
75th percentile
61.5%
Best window
218.3%

Worst start: October 2010-83.9% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: May 2020218.3% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CGCL came out ahead in 63.1% of the 179 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

74.8% of windows made money

Across 155 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 33.3% a year. The worst lost 43.6% a year and the best made 94.7%.

-43.6%median 33.3%94.7%
Worst window
-43.6%
25th percentile
1.7%
75th percentile
55.1%
Best window
94.7%

Worst start: October 2010-43.6% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: May 201694.7% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CGCL came out ahead in 69.7% of the 155 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

85.5% of windows made money

Across 131 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 35.5% a year. The worst lost 26.1% a year and the best made 83.1%.

-26.1%median 35.5%83.1%
Worst window
-26.1%
25th percentile
7.3%
75th percentile
48.5%
Best window
83.1%

Worst start: October 2010-26.1% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: June 201683.1% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CGCL came out ahead in 74.0% of the 131 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

99.1% of windows made money

Across 107 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 33.7% a year. The worst lost 2.4% a year and the best made 63.6%.

-2.4%median 33.7%63.6%
Worst window
-2.4%
25th percentile
17.1%
75th percentile
47.5%
Best window
63.6%

Worst start: October 2010-2.4% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: June 201663.6% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CGCL came out ahead in 77.6% of the 107 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 71 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 31.1% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 6.5% a year.

6.5%median 31.1%45.9%
Worst window
6.5%
25th percentile
20.7%
75th percentile
41.6%
Best window
45.9%

Worst start: October 20106.5% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: July 201245.9% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: CGCL came out ahead in 98.6% of the 71 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often CGCL beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 10-year windows, CGCL finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 98.6% of the 71 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 63.1% of 179 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 69.7% of 155 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 74.0% of 131 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 77.6% of 107 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 98.6% of 71 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of CGCL's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

CGCLis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2010-10-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

CGCL rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are CGCL rolling returns?
+

Over 10 years, Capri Global Capital Ltd. has been through 71 separate 10 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 31.1% a year, the worst 6.5% and the best 45.9%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has CGCL ever lost money over 10 years?
+

No — not in any of the 71 10 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 6.5% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 10 years, and it is measured only over the years Capri Global Capital Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years CGCL has ever had?
+

-26.1% a year, for the five years beginning October 2010. For contrast the best 5 years returned 83.1% a year, starting June 2016, and the median across all 131 periods was 35.5%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding CGCL for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -83.9% to 218.3% a year — a spread of 302.2%. 10 years outcomes ranged from 6.5% to 45.9%, a spread of 39.4%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has CGCL beaten Nifty 50 over 10 years?
+

In 98.6% of the 71 10 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Capri Global Capital Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is CGCL a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Capri Global Capital Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Capri Global Capital Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.