ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

AWL Rolling Returns

AWL Agri Business Ltd.

Every 3-year stretch AWL has been through — 19 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned -23.9% a year, the worst -30.1%, the best -13.4%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
19
Median
-23.9%
Worst
-30.1%
Best
-13.4%

Every Holding Period

AWL rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

9.3% of windows made money

Across 43 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned -23.2% a year. The worst lost 55.3% a year and the best made 6.0%.

-55.3%median -23.2%6.0%
Worst window
-55.3%
25th percentile
-30.3%
75th percentile
-18.7%
Best window
6.0%

Worst start: September 2022-55.3% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: October 20236.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: AWL came out ahead in 0.0% of the 43 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

0.0% of windows made money

Across 19 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned -23.9% a year. Every one of them ended in a loss, the mildest at -13.4% a year.

-30.1%median -23.9%-13.4%
Worst window
-30.1%
25th percentile
-26.1%
75th percentile
-22.3%
Best window
-13.4%

Worst start: April 2022-30.1% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: February 2022-13.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: AWL came out ahead in 0.0% of the 19 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often AWL beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 3-year windows, AWL finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 0.0% of the 19 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 0.0% of 43 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 0.0% of 19 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of AWL's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

AWLis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2022-02-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

AWL rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are AWL rolling returns?
+

Over 3 years, AWL Agri Business Ltd. has been through 19 separate 3 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned -23.9% a year, the worst -30.1% and the best -13.4%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has AWL ever lost money over 3 years?
+

Yes. 100.0% of the 19 3 years periods on record ended below where they started, and the worst of them lost 30.1% a year — the stretch beginning April 2022. The median period returned -23.9% a year.

Does holding AWL for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -55.3% to 6.0% a year — a spread of 61.3%. 3 years outcomes ranged from -30.1% to -13.4%, a spread of 16.6%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has AWL beaten Nifty 50 over 3 years?
+

In 0.0% of the 19 3 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of AWL Agri Business Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is AWL a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of AWL Agri Business Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on AWL Agri Business Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.