ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

ARE&M Rolling Returns

Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Ltd.

Every 15-year stretch ARE&M has been through — 47 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 19.0% a year, the worst 15.1%, the best 30.9%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
47
Median
19.0%
Worst
15.1%
Best
30.9%

Every Holding Period

ARE&M rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

62.3% of windows made money

Across 215 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 10.5% a year. The worst lost 75.6% a year and the best made 351.5%.

-75.6%median 10.5%351.5%
Worst window
-75.6%
25th percentile
-9.4%
75th percentile
54.0%
Best window
351.5%

Worst start: February 2008-75.6% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: March 2009351.5% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ARE&M came out ahead in 56.7% of the 215 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

68.6% of windows made money

Across 191 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 18.2% a year. The worst lost 17.6% a year and the best made 103.0%.

-17.6%median 18.2%103.0%
Worst window
-17.6%
25th percentile
-2.7%
75th percentile
48.2%
Best window
103.0%

Worst start: March 2017-17.6% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: March 2009103.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ARE&M came out ahead in 58.1% of the 191 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

73.7% of windows made money

Across 167 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 13.4% a year. The worst lost 10.3% a year and the best made 89.1%.

-10.3%median 13.4%89.1%
Worst window
-10.3%
25th percentile
-1.0%
75th percentile
45.5%
Best window
89.1%

Worst start: June 2017-10.3% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: February 200989.1% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ARE&M came out ahead in 49.7% of the 167 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

81.8% of windows made money

Across 143 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 14.5% a year. The worst lost 9.2% a year and the best made 76.2%.

-9.2%median 14.5%76.2%
Worst window
-9.2%
25th percentile
3.7%
75th percentile
37.8%
Best window
76.2%

Worst start: September 2015-9.2% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: February 200976.2% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ARE&M came out ahead in 54.5% of the 143 windows both series cover.

10-year rolling returns

99.1% of windows made money

Across 107 separate 10-year holding periods, the median returned 15.5% a year. The worst lost 1.6% a year and the best made 46.4%.

-1.6%median 15.5%46.4%
Worst window
-1.6%
25th percentile
8.8%
75th percentile
26.9%
Best window
46.4%

Worst start: March 2016-1.6% a year for the 10 years that followed.

Best start: February 200946.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ARE&M came out ahead in 57.0% of the 107 windows both series cover.

15-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 47 separate 15-year holding periods, the median returned 19.0% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 15.1% a year.

15.1%median 19.0%30.9%
Worst window
15.1%
25th percentile
17.4%
75th percentile
23.2%
Best window
30.9%

Worst start: March 201115.1% a year for the 15 years that followed.

Best start: February 200930.9% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ARE&M came out ahead in 100.0% of the 47 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often ARE&M beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 15-year windows, ARE&M finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 100.0% of the 47 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 56.7% of 215 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 58.1% of 191 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 49.7% of 167 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 54.5% of 143 periods.

10-year windows

Ahead in 57.0% of 107 periods.

15-year windows

Ahead in 100.0% of 47 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of ARE&M's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

ARE&Mis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2007-10-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

ARE&M rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are ARE&M rolling returns?
+

Over 15 years, Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Ltd. has been through 47 separate 15 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 19.0% a year, the worst 15.1% and the best 30.9%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has ARE&M ever lost money over 10 years?
+

Yes. 0.9% of the 107 10 years periods on record ended below where they started, and the worst of them lost 1.6% a year — the stretch beginning March 2016. The median period returned 15.5% a year.

What is the worst 5 years ARE&M has ever had?
+

-10.3% a year, for the five years beginning June 2017. For contrast the best 5 years returned 89.1% a year, starting February 2009, and the median across all 167 periods was 13.4%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding ARE&M for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -75.6% to 351.5% a year — a spread of 427.1%. 15 years outcomes ranged from 15.1% to 30.9%, a spread of 15.8%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has ARE&M beaten Nifty 50 over 15 years?
+

In 100.0% of the 47 15 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is ARE&M a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.