ReturnScreener

Rolling Returns

ALKEM Rolling Returns

Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

Every 7-year stretch ALKEM has been through — 45 of them, each starting a month after the last. The median returned 16.1% a year, the worst 11.6%, the best 20.4%. A single headline CAGR hides all of that.

Windows measured
45
Median
16.1%
Worst
11.6%
Best
20.4%

Every Holding Period

ALKEM rolling returns by holding period

A rolling window is every possible start date, not one. A five-year window starting in January is a different investment from one starting in February, and over twenty years there are a couple of hundred of them. What follows is the full spread of what each holding period actually produced.

1-year rolling returns

74.4% of windows made money

Across 117 separate 1-year holding periods, the median returned 15.4% a year. The worst lost 22.6% a year and the best made 75.7%.

-22.6%median 15.4%75.7%
Worst window
-22.6%
25th percentile
-0.2%
75th percentile
34.6%
Best window
75.7%

Worst start: August 2021-22.6% a year for the 1 years that followed.

Best start: December 202275.7% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ALKEM came out ahead in 49.6% of the 117 windows both series cover.

3-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 93 separate 3-year holding periods, the median returned 16.5% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 2.8% a year.

2.8%median 16.5%29.0%
Worst window
2.8%
25th percentile
12.3%
75th percentile
20.4%
Best window
29.0%

Worst start: March 20172.8% a year for the 3 years that followed.

Best start: March 201929.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ALKEM came out ahead in 73.1% of the 93 windows both series cover.

5-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 69 separate 5-year holding periods, the median returned 15.7% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 7.4% a year.

7.4%median 15.7%29.0%
Worst window
7.4%
25th percentile
13.1%
75th percentile
19.3%
Best window
29.0%

Worst start: December 20177.4% a year for the 5 years that followed.

Best start: August 201929.0% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ALKEM came out ahead in 73.9% of the 69 windows both series cover.

7-year rolling returns

100.0% of windows made money

Across 45 separate 7-year holding periods, the median returned 16.1% a year. Not one of them ended in a loss — the weakest still compounded at 11.6% a year.

11.6%median 16.1%20.4%
Worst window
11.6%
25th percentile
14.9%
75th percentile
18.0%
Best window
20.4%

Worst start: December 201511.6% a year for the 7 years that followed.

Best start: August 201720.4% a year.

Against the Nifty 50: ALKEM came out ahead in 95.6% of the 45 windows both series cover.

Windows step forward one month at a time and are measured on month-end adjusted closing prices, so dividends are treated as reinvested. Overlapping windows share months by construction — that is what makes the spread a description of this stock's history rather than a sample of independent trials.

Against The Index

How often ALKEM beat the Nifty 50

Beating an index once is a result. Beating it across most of the periods an investor could have picked is a pattern. Over 7-year windows, ALKEM finished ahead of the Nifty 50 in 95.6% of the 45 periods both series cover.

1-year windows

Ahead in 49.6% of 117 periods.

3-year windows

Ahead in 73.1% of 93 periods.

5-year windows

Ahead in 73.9% of 69 periods.

7-year windows

Ahead in 95.6% of 45 periods.

Each window is compared against the index over the identical calendar months, on the same adjusted basis — not against an assumed rate of return.

How This Is Calculated

Reading these figures properly

Overlapping by design

Windows step forward one month at a time, so they share most of their months with each other. That is what makes this a description of ALKEM's actual history rather than a set of independent trials — and why the spread should not be read as a probability.

Month-end, total return

Measured on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends count as reinvested. A window that opened or closed mid-month would differ a little in either direction.

Survivors only

ALKEMis in today's Nifty 500 universe. Companies that delisted or collapsed are not on this site at all, so the worst outcome shown here is the worst among the survivors.

Measured on data to 2026-08-31, from 2015-12-01. Full definitions are on our methodology page.

HELP CENTER

ALKEM rolling returns — common questions

Everything you need to know about this page and the data presented.

What are ALKEM rolling returns?
+

Over 7 years, Alkem Laboratories Ltd. has been through 45 separate 7 years holding periods — one starting every month. The median returned 16.1% a year, the worst 11.6% and the best 20.4%. A rolling return measures every possible start date instead of one, which is why it answers a question a single headline CAGR cannot: how much the outcome depended on when you happened to buy.

Has ALKEM ever lost money over 7 years?
+

No — not in any of the 45 7 years periods the record covers. The weakest of them still compounded at 11.6% a year. That is a statement about the past, not a guarantee about any future 7 years, and it is measured only over the years Alkem Laboratories Ltd. has been listed.

What is the worst 5 years ALKEM has ever had?
+

7.4% a year, for the five years beginning December 2017. For contrast the best 5 years returned 29.0% a year, starting August 2019, and the median across all 69 periods was 15.7%. The gap between those two numbers is the part of the outcome that came down to timing rather than to the company.

Does holding ALKEM for longer reduce the risk?
+

On this record, yes. 1 year outcomes ranged from -22.6% to 75.7% a year — a spread of 98.2%. 7 years outcomes ranged from 11.6% to 20.4%, a spread of 8.8%. Longer holding periods narrowed the range of results, which is the usual pattern and the reason this page publishes every window rather than one. Narrowing the range is not the same as removing the risk.

How often has ALKEM beaten Nifty 50 over 7 years?
+

In 95.6% of the 45 7 years periods both series cover. Each window is compared against the index over the identical months, not against an assumed index return, so the comparison is a like-for-like record rather than a model.

How are rolling returns calculated here?
+

Windows step forward one month at a time on month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and stock splits, so dividends are treated as reinvested. A window length is only published once there are at least twelve complete windows behind it — fewer than that describes an anecdote, not a distribution. Overlapping windows share months by construction, which is what makes this a description of the actual history of Alkem Laboratories Ltd. rather than a sample of independent trials. Companies that delisted are not on this site at all, a survivorship bias worth holding in mind.

Is ALKEM a safe long-term investment?
+

That is not a question this page answers, and we do not make recommendations. What it can show you is the full range of what every holding period in the listed history of Alkem Laboratories Ltd. actually produced — including the worst ones, which most performance figures leave out. Those are records of what happened, not forecasts. A stock that never had a losing decade may still have one, and holding a single company is a materially different risk from holding an index.

Explore Further

More on Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

ReturnScreener is an educational research platform and is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Everything on this page is a record of what historical prices did, not a projection and not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. See our methodology and disclaimer.